![]() “I don’t understand why it’s so inexpensive.” - Podfeet.“A revolution for photo editing.” - Professional Photographer Magazine.CameraBag’s focus on intuitive tools and workflows isn’t about dumbing down image editing, it’s about making it work better. The best kept secret in photography (and videography) just got a whole lot better! CameraBag lets you instantly apply one of hundreds of beautiful presets to your photos and videos, and then dive deeper with ultra-intuitive professional adjustments and custom presets. I think Apple made the right choice.About This Software ***CameraBag Pro: Professional Editing and Filtering for Photos and Videos***ĬameraBag Pro includes all the same great features as CameraBag Photo, but also works on videos and includes LUT file support! ![]() The problem is, busy editors don't REALLY want innovation. The problem with FCP was always the uncertainty of it, hence the reason Avid is still in use at most shops, despite the fact that editors love to bash it.Īs time marches on, I can see where FCP might, yet again, be at the forefront of innovation. Editors are a finicky bunch, and I can certainly see Apple realizing that to truly compete in that market, it's all or nothing. I can't speak for feature film editors, but virtually all of the commercial film editors I know still, to this day, use Avid for most of their projects. I know plenty of shops that USE FCP along with Avid, but the risk was always too great to fully abandon a platform that was proven to work (most of the time). I can't think of any well known commercial post-houses that abandoned Avid for Final Cut Pro completely. I used to work in the post-production industry here in Chicago, specifically as an editor. It's not small, but I think Apple is making a poor bet if they think the millions of ppl creating video with their phones and cameras is going to buy this product. ![]() There are amateur video editors out there, but I don't think its a growing market. The problem is that nothing in FCPX fixes their core issues - most revolve around video management, and not actual editing. My wife (and her friends) regularly record GBs of video each week. It does 99% of what you need and braindead simple. Most people will be fine with iMovie or Windows Live Movie Maker. But I seriously doubt I will ever pay again (unless it's $2.99 or something). It was painful, but I needed it for a specific reason. I actually paid for Adobe Elements a few years back. There are two types of people: People who pay for video editing software and those that don't. It sounds to me they're taking how they build the iPhone and iPad and applying it to FCP, and it doesn't work. If this is Apple's thinking, I think they're in serious trouble. Format support, and in particular tape support, may get left behind, but in this brave new world, tape is less and less relevant. Over time we can expect Apple to provide better workflow support - they've already indicated that they are adding xml support and a few other things that will go towards addressing many criticisms of workflow changes. FCPX is blazingly fast compared to the other video editors out there, and that is a killer feature. It may not be as capable as the other video editors out there in terms of format support / workflow support (and I include FCP7 in the list of competitors), but what it does do, it does really well. Not as capable, but way cheaper and way easier to use, it ended up completely wiping out the old typesetting systems. Or what about desktop publishing versus old page layout solutions. Also, isn't this just a straight up example of disrupting an industry? When the PC came along, it wasn't as capable as the minicomputer, but it let you have a lot more control over your own environment, and it was a lot cheaper.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |